返回

身边的经济学·社会常识英语精读30篇(9)

17 / 30
已读 0 / 30 课
Why 'Productivity' Metrics Fail to Capture Care Work — And How That Skews National Accounts

Why 'Productivity' Metrics Fail to Capture Care Work — And How That Skews National Accounts

为何‘生产力’指标无法衡量照护工作——及其对国民账户的扭曲

  1. National productivity statistics exclude unpaid caregiving—childcare, elder support, chronic illness management—even though it enables formal labor participation.
  2. When mothers reduce paid hours to care for aging parents, GDP registers only the income loss, not the value preserved through avoided nursing home costs.
  3. Time-use surveys consistently show women perform 2.5 times more unpaid care work than men globally, yet this remains invisible in output measures.
  4. Attempts to monetize care—using replacement-cost or opportunity-cost methods—yield wildly divergent estimates, undermining comparability.
  5. Policy decisions—from pension reforms to childcare subsidies—are made without quantifying this foundational economic activity.
  6. The OECD now publishes experimental satellite accounts for unpaid work, but they lack statutory weight in fiscal planning.
  7. Care-intensive sectors like education and healthcare face chronic underfunding because their outputs resist conventional productivity measurement.
  8. Automation rhetoric further marginalizes care work, framing it as 'low-skill' despite its emotional, cognitive, and relational complexity.
  9. Revising national accounts to include care would recalibrate debates about labor force participation and intergenerational equity.
  10. This omission isn’t technical—it reflects enduring hierarchies that privilege market-mediated over socially necessary labor.
  11. Until care work appears in headline indicators, its erosion will continue unchecked by macroeconomic policy.
  12. True productivity accounting must ask not just 'how much we produce,' but 'what makes production possible at all.'
上一页
/ 30
下一页