正在确认阅读权限…
How Cross-National Tax Treaty Networks Enable Profit Shifting — Even Without Traditional Havens
跨国税收协定网络如何促成利润转移——即使不依赖传统避税港
精读先不看文字,完整听一遍。
-
Modern profit shifting increasingly exploits mismatches between treaty partners’ domestic definitions of permanent establishment and digital service taxation.现代利润转移日益利用税收协定缔约国对常设机构及数字服务征税的国内定义差异。
-
Treaty shopping—routing profits through jurisdictions with favorable bilateral agreements—requires no physical presence, only strategic incorporation.税收协定滥用——通过拥有优惠双边协定的司法管辖区转移利润——无需实体存在,仅需战略性注册。
-
Developing countries often sign treaties offering extensive relief without negotiating safeguards against base erosion or requiring minimum substance tests.发展中国家常签署提供广泛减免的协定,却未就防止税基侵蚀或设定最低实质要求进行谈判。
-
Multinationals use hybrid mismatch arrangements where payments qualify as deductible expenses in one jurisdiction but escape taxation elsewhere entirely.跨国企业利用混合错配安排,使同一笔付款在一国可税前扣除,而在他国则完全免于征税。
-
OECD’s Pillar Two framework addresses rate gaps but struggles with treaty-based carve-outs that preserve preferential treatment for specific sectors.OECD第二支柱框架虽弥补税率差距,却难以应对基于协定的例外条款,后者保留特定行业的优惠待遇。
-
Domestic anti-abuse rules remain unenforceable if treaties explicitly override them—a common clause in older agreements.若税收协定明文凌驾于国内反避税规则之上——此类条款在旧协定中十分常见——则国内反避税规则便无法执行。
-
Revenue authorities lack mutual agreement procedure capacity to resolve disputes involving complex multi-jurisdictional value chains.税务机关缺乏相互协商程序能力,难以解决涉及复杂多边价值链的争议。
-
Digital services taxes emerged precisely because treaty networks proved inadequate for taxing intangible value creation remotely.数字服务税应运而生,正是因为现有税收协定网络无法有效对远程无形价值创造征税。
-
Treaty negotiations now include mandatory arbitration clauses, yet outcomes remain opaque and inaccessible to public scrutiny.当前税收协定谈判已纳入强制仲裁条款,但裁决结果仍不透明,公众无法监督。
-
Profit attribution methodologies still rely on outdated arm’s-length principles ill-suited for integrated global platforms.利润归属方法仍依赖过时的独立交易原则,难以适配高度整合的全球平台。
-
Systemic reform requires treaty modernization that embeds transparency obligations and dynamic adjustment triggers—not static bilateral concessions.系统性改革需推动税收协定现代化,嵌入透明度义务与动态调整机制,而非固守静态双边让步。
-
Tax sovereignty today depends less on unilateral legislation than on coordinated renegotiation of the entire treaty architecture.当今税收主权更多取决于整个税收协定体系的协同重谈,而非单边立法。
精读 · 大约 10 分钟
听 → 读 → 学表达 → 懂 → 今天会说这一句 → 跟读录音 → 自己说一句。
③ 学 · 重点表达
- Profit attribution methodologies still rely on outdated arm’s-length principles ill-suited for integrated global platforms. 利润归属方法仍依赖过时的独立交易原则,难以适配高度整合的全球平台。
- Treaty shopping—routing profits through jurisdictions with favorable bilateral agreements—requires no physical presence, only strategic incorporation. 税收协定滥用——通过拥有优惠双边协定的司法管辖区转移利润——无需实体存在,仅需战略性注册。
- Domestic anti-abuse rules remain unenforceable if treaties explicitly override them—a common clause in older agreements. 若税收协定明文凌驾于国内反避税规则之上——此类条款在旧协定中十分常见——则国内反避税规则便无法执行。
④ 懂 · 选一选
⑤ 今天会说这一句
Profit attribution methodologies still rely on outdated arm’s-length principles ill-suited for integrated global platforms.
⑥ 跟读并录音
Profit attribution methodologies still rely on outdated arm’s-length principles ill-suited for integrated global platforms.
第一版:录下来、回听、再听标准音。系统打分以后再加。
⑦ 说 · 自己来一句
用今天的表达,自己说一句。
例子:Profit attribution methodologies still rely on outdated arm’s-length principles ill-suited for integrated global platforms.
已记下。连续天数以后会显示在课表里。
陈老师指导
课程开发中,敬请期待。成人和孩子都可以先自学听读、精读。
这边的讲解音轨还在做。想先跟着老师走完固定 30 课,可以去陈老师带读社(和自学通行不是同一份会员)。
课程开发中,敬请期待。