正在确认阅读权限…
The Codex Justinianus and the Standardization of Legal Temporality
《查士丁尼法典》与法律时间性的制度化
-
Commissioned in sixth-century Constantinople, the Codex Justinianus systematized centuries of Roman jurisprudence into a single, hierarchical textual architecture.六世纪君士坦丁堡敕令编纂的《查士丁尼法典》，将数个世纪的罗马法学系统整合为一套层级分明的文本体系。
-
Its compilers deliberately eliminated contradictory rulings by assigning temporal priority to imperial edicts issued after 312 CE, thereby inventing legal chronology as an administrative tool.编者刻意剔除相互矛盾的判例，规定公元312年之后颁布的皇帝敕令具有时间优先性，由此将法律编年法创设为一种行政工具。
-
This temporal framing transformed law from situational interpretation into cumulative precedent, enabling bureaucratic continuity across regime shifts.这种时间框架使法律从情境化解释转变为累积性先例，保障官僚体系在政权更迭中持续运转。
-
Unlike earlier collections, it mandated uniform dating protocols for legal citations, embedding calendar standardization within judicial practice.与早期法典不同，它强制统一法律引注的纪年规范，将历法标准化嵌入司法实践。
-
Provincial governors used its chronological scaffolding to reconcile local customs with imperial authority without overt cultural erasure.地方总督借助其编年结构，在不强行抹除本土习俗的前提下，调和地方传统与帝国权威。
-
The Code’s temporal logic later enabled medieval canon lawyers to distinguish divine eternity from human legislative time, shaping scholastic theology.该法典的时间逻辑后来助力中世纪教会法学家区分神之永恒与人之立法时间，塑造经院神学。
-
By treating legal validity as functionally dependent on date-stamped promulgation, it prefigured modern regulatory sunset clauses and review cycles.它将法律效力系于带日期的颁布行为，预示了现代监管中的日落条款与定期复审机制。
-
Its influence persisted in Napoleonic codification, where legislative expiration dates became mechanisms for democratic accountability.其影响延续至拿破仑法典编纂，立法失效日期成为民主问责的制度手段。
-
Even today, international tribunals apply analogous temporal hierarchies when adjudicating treaties ratified at different historical junctures.直至今日，国际法庭在裁决不同历史节点批准的条约时，仍运用类似的时间等级结构。
-
The Codex thus established not just legal content but a durable grammar of normative temporality across Eurasian statecraft.因此，《查士丁尼法典》确立的不仅是法律内容，更是一种贯穿欧亚治国实践的持久性规范时间语法。
-
Its legacy lies less in preserved statutes than in the institutional habit of measuring legitimacy through calibrated historical sequence.其遗产不在于保存了多少条文，而在于将合法性建基于精密校准的历史序列这一制度惯习。
-
This redefinition of law as chronologically anchored practice remains foundational to global administrative law.将法律重新定义为以时间为锚点的实践，至今仍是全球行政法的基石。