Athenian Democracy: Voice and Limits

雅典民主：声音与边界

课文音频

可先听下面的整段朗读；需要逐句点读时，请打开阅读器，体验会更顺手。

课文

Around 508 BCE, Cleisthenes reorganized Athens’ tribes and introduced citizen assemblies open to all free men.

公元前508年左右，克利斯提尼重组了雅典的部落，并设立向所有自由男性开放的公民大会。
Male citizens over 18 could speak, vote, and serve on juries — but women, slaves, and foreigners were excluded.

年满18岁的男性公民可发言、投票并担任陪审员，但妇女、奴隶和外邦人被排除在外。
Officials were chosen by lot, not election, to prevent wealthy families from dominating public office.

官员通过抽签而非选举产生，以防富裕家族垄断公职。
The Assembly met forty times yearly on the Pnyx hill, debating war, law, and religious festivals.

公民大会每年在普尼克斯山召开四十次，讨论战争、法律和宗教节庆等事务。
Socrates questioned democracy’s wisdom, asking whether voting required knowledge — or just citizenship.

苏格拉底质疑民主的智慧，追问投票究竟需要知识，还是仅凭公民身份即可？
Ostracism let citizens exile dangerous leaders for ten years without trial — a safeguard against tyranny.

陶片放逐法允许公民不经审判将危险领袖流放十年，以防范暴政。
Despite its limits, Athens’ system inspired later thinkers like Locke and Rousseau centuries later.

尽管存在局限，雅典的制度数百年后仍启发了洛克、卢梭等思想家。
Citizens funded plays and temples, believing culture strengthened shared identity and civic pride.

公民出资资助戏剧演出和神庙建设，认为文化能强化共同认同与 civic 骄傲。
Democracy here was direct, local, and demanding — requiring time, travel, and active participation.

这里的民主是直接的、地方性的、高参与度的——要求时间、奔波与积极投入。
It proved that collective decision-making could work, even if only for a small, privileged group.

它证明了集体决策可行，哪怕仅限于少数特权群体。