身边的经济学·社会常识英语30篇(5)
10 / 30
正在确认阅读权限…
Why Some Countries Tax Sugary Drinks—and What Changed
为什么一些国家对含糖饮料征税?效果如何?
-
Mexico introduced a sugar tax in 2014 after studies linked soda to rising diabetes and childhood obesity rates nationwide.墨西哥于2014年开征糖税,此前多项研究将含糖饮料与全国糖尿病及儿童肥胖率上升联系起来。
-
Sales of taxed drinks dropped 12% in the first year, while water and unsweetened tea sales rose steadily among low-income families.征税饮料销量首年下降12%,而低收入家庭对水和无糖茶的购买量持续上升。
-
Manufacturers reformulated many products—cutting sugar by up to 30%—to avoid the tax without changing labels or prices.制造商重新配方多种产品,减糖高达30%,以规避征税,且未更改标签或售价。
-
Revenue funds school health programs, public fitness zones, and nutrition education—not general government budgets alone.税收用于资助学校健康项目、公共健身区及营养教育,而非仅纳入政府一般预算。
-
Teenagers responded most strongly, likely because they drink more soda and notice price changes more than adults do.青少年反应最强烈,可能因其饮用更多碳酸饮料,且比成人更敏感于价格变化。
-
Some people switched to untaxed ‘sports drinks’ or flavored waters, showing how policy must evolve with consumer behavior.部分人转向未征税的‘运动饮料’或风味水,表明政策需随消费者行为动态调整。
-
Tax alone didn’t fix diet habits—but combined with clearer labels and school bans, it became part of a lasting shift.单靠征税未能改变饮食习惯,但结合更清晰的标签和校园禁售措施后,它成为持久转变的一部分。
-
It proves that small, well-designed nudges can support healthier choices without banning anything outright.这证明,设计得当的小幅干预措施可在不直接禁止的前提下,助力人们做出更健康的选择。